http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/24/claws-mail-part-v/ Just my thoughts about things Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:30:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/24/claws-mail-part-v/#comment-3 Peter Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:20:17 +0000 http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/24/claws-mail-part-v/#comment-3 Well if you take out the networking part Spamassassin is pretty fast as well. Right now I took out the RBL checks but kept the Razor2 check and it's doing pretty well. Well if you take out the networking part Spamassassin is pretty fast as well.
Right now I took out the RBL checks but kept the Razor2 check and it’s doing pretty well.

]]> http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/24/claws-mail-part-v/#comment-2 Colin Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:37:52 +0000 http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2007/10/24/claws-mail-part-v/#comment-2 It's true that Spamassassin filtering is rather slow. It's, as you saw, mostly due to network checks, and the fact that Spamassassin is written in Perl. The other spam filtering plugin, based on Bogofilter, is much faster - but it only does Bayesian checks. It’s true that Spamassassin filtering is rather slow. It’s, as you saw, mostly due to network checks, and the fact that Spamassassin is written in Perl.
The other spam filtering plugin, based on Bogofilter, is much faster - but it only does Bayesian checks.

]]>