<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to update your custom Ubuntu Karmic kernel after a new kernel release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/</link>
	<description>Just my thoughts about things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadym</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>Peter,
As far as I remember I backed up my config.flavour since 17.54 and now is 20.57, but it asks for more and more options as they appear in new kernels. If I compile kernel right after rules clean, kernelconfig editconfig then no problem, but if I backup my custom flavour, do git cleanup then restore my flavour then it asks to specify values for new options again.
I did pretty many changes to the generic flavour and the last option is to redo it from the scratch, but this will consume more time than I&#039;d like to invest.

Thanks for your response and a nice guide to have custom built Ubuntu kernel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
As far as I remember I backed up my config.flavour since 17.54 and now is 20.57, but it asks for more and more options as they appear in new kernels. If I compile kernel right after rules clean, kernelconfig editconfig then no problem, but if I backup my custom flavour, do git cleanup then restore my flavour then it asks to specify values for new options again.<br />
I did pretty many changes to the generic flavour and the last option is to redo it from the scratch, but this will consume more time than I&#8217;d like to invest.</p>
<p>Thanks for your response and a nice guide to have custom built Ubuntu kernel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-6005</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-6005</guid>
		<description>Interesting as it has never asked me for specific values, it just assumes the default value. From what version to what version did you try to compile a kernel version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting as it has never asked me for specific values, it just assumes the default value. From what version to what version did you try to compile a kernel version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-6004</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-6004</guid>
		<description>It needs to be recompiled from scratch as far as I can tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It needs to be recompiled from scratch as far as I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadym</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

I wonder how do you deal with kernel options that appear in newer kernels? Kernelconfig oldconfig asks to specify values for them at the first run, but doesn&#039;t remember them. As the result it asks again to specify new options at compile time. I tried to backup config.common.ubuntu and generic and got into even more troubles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>I wonder how do you deal with kernel options that appear in newer kernels? Kernelconfig oldconfig asks to specify values for them at the first run, but doesn&#8217;t remember them. As the result it asks again to specify new options at compile time. I tried to backup config.common.ubuntu and generic and got into even more troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-5771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-5771</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,
Thanks for your reply. The response to 
&quot;What is the result of this command line:
getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN&quot;
is indeed 4.  Do you have any other idea what might speed up the compile process?

After an initial compile, is it possible to do a faster recompile with a few minor changes (i.e. can a recompile use previously compiled bits) or does it need to be re-compiled from scratch each time?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,<br />
Thanks for your reply. The response to<br />
&#8220;What is the result of this command line:<br />
getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN&#8221;<br />
is indeed 4.  Do you have any other idea what might speed up the compile process?</p>
<p>After an initial compile, is it possible to do a faster recompile with a few minor changes (i.e. can a recompile use previously compiled bits) or does it need to be re-compiled from scratch each time?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-5762</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-5762</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s answer your 2nd question first:
There isn&#039;t really a faster way unfortunately. An hour seems rather long, I&#039;m wondering if all 4 processors are utilized, What is the result of this command line:
getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN

It should be four in your case.

As for your first question:
Changed the memory setting:
 Processor type and features  ---&gt;  High Memory Support  ---&gt; 64GB

Processor:
 Processor type and features  ---&gt; Processor family  ---&gt;  Core 2/newer Xeon

Disable General x86, I compiled for my processor so no need for general x86 support:
 Processor type and features  ---&gt; Generic x86 support

Disabled Toshiba support as my laptop is not a Toshiba.
Disabled certain filesystems, as I know I will never use them in my environment.
Disabled certain network options, again I will never need them (IPX for example)

If compiled for your processor, technically it should perform better, but I doubt if you will notice it. The kernel doesn&#039;t have your specific kernel optimization. You can choose the option Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8 in the Processor type option though.

It&#039;s not so much you are customizing an Ubuntu kernel, you are customizing a kernel. The difference between the Ubuntu kernel and a vanilla kernel are patches the Ubuntu kernel team have approved. I don&#039;t really have one or two online resources myself. For the customization I just lean on my experience and Google.

I hope it helps a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s answer your 2nd question first:<br />
There isn&#8217;t really a faster way unfortunately. An hour seems rather long, I&#8217;m wondering if all 4 processors are utilized, What is the result of this command line:<br />
getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN</p>
<p>It should be four in your case.</p>
<p>As for your first question:<br />
Changed the memory setting:<br />
 Processor type and features  &#8212;>  High Memory Support  &#8212;> 64GB</p>
<p>Processor:<br />
 Processor type and features  &#8212;> Processor family  &#8212;>  Core 2/newer Xeon</p>
<p>Disable General x86, I compiled for my processor so no need for general x86 support:<br />
 Processor type and features  &#8212;> Generic x86 support</p>
<p>Disabled Toshiba support as my laptop is not a Toshiba.<br />
Disabled certain filesystems, as I know I will never use them in my environment.<br />
Disabled certain network options, again I will never need them (IPX for example)</p>
<p>If compiled for your processor, technically it should perform better, but I doubt if you will notice it. The kernel doesn&#8217;t have your specific kernel optimization. You can choose the option Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8 in the Processor type option though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much you are customizing an Ubuntu kernel, you are customizing a kernel. The difference between the Ubuntu kernel and a vanilla kernel are patches the Ubuntu kernel team have approved. I don&#8217;t really have one or two online resources myself. For the customization I just lean on my experience and Google.</p>
<p>I hope it helps a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>Hi. I have two questions:

(1) In the previous article you wrote:
&quot;I wrote this how to because my laptop has 4GB of internal memory and with the default kernel that ships with Ubuntu Karmic the entire 4GB is not addressed.&quot;
and
&quot;Besides the change of processor type in the configuration I also select support for 64GB as my laptop has 4GB, which is the main reason I started compiling my own kernels. I have some other changes but that’s beyond this article.&quot;
Could you please explain a little bit more about what you did?  If a kernel is compiled for a specific processor does it perform better?  Is it possible for me to configure the kernel for my AMD Phenom and, if so, how/where? Can you suggest any further online resources for customizing an Ubuntu kernel?

(2) The step:
skipabi=true skipmodule=true fakeroot debian/rules binary-core2
takes a long time to compile on my quad-core AMD processor (about an hour). If I wish to make a small change to the source and re-compile, is there a faster way of doing this?

Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I have two questions:</p>
<p>(1) In the previous article you wrote:<br />
&#8220;I wrote this how to because my laptop has 4GB of internal memory and with the default kernel that ships with Ubuntu Karmic the entire 4GB is not addressed.&#8221;<br />
and<br />
&#8220;Besides the change of processor type in the configuration I also select support for 64GB as my laptop has 4GB, which is the main reason I started compiling my own kernels. I have some other changes but that’s beyond this article.&#8221;<br />
Could you please explain a little bit more about what you did?  If a kernel is compiled for a specific processor does it perform better?  Is it possible for me to configure the kernel for my AMD Phenom and, if so, how/where? Can you suggest any further online resources for customizing an Ubuntu kernel?</p>
<p>(2) The step:<br />
skipabi=true skipmodule=true fakeroot debian/rules binary-core2<br />
takes a long time to compile on my quad-core AMD processor (about an hour). If I wish to make a small change to the source and re-compile, is there a faster way of doing this?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/10/how-to-update-your-custom-ubuntu-karmic-kernel-after-a-new-kernel-release/#comment-5071</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avirtualhome.com/?p=503#comment-5071</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Thanks for both tutorials! Really great job. But I think I found another typo:

&quot;linux-image-2.6.31-15_2.6.31-15.50_all.deb&quot; 

should be 

linux-image-2.6.31-15_2.6.31-15.50_i386.deb

Regards,
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for both tutorials! Really great job. But I think I found another typo:</p>
<p>&#8220;linux-image-2.6.31-15_2.6.31-15.50_all.deb&#8221; </p>
<p>should be </p>
<p>linux-image-2.6.31-15_2.6.31-15.50_i386.deb</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

